Um the carbon tax is happening - it will be unseen or on the table - I choose the table

This site  The Web 

So, I'm starting something new here at this site that is over 13 years old I'm recollecting.  I'm starting this new thing here at the top of the site in honor of the New Year that has just begun and plan on coming back here year after year.  Anyhow, it is January 1, 2021 or as I like to say:  "1121".  So I think 2021 is the year of reckoning.  That is just what I think.  The other thing I think just now that I think I used to have in the text below (but it got deleted not too long ago) is that too many rules just ruin everything, and so I want to say that again cause I didn't mean to delete it when I did.  My Lord knows too many rules ruin everything.  Mi-Re knows as well as does Re-Mi (read on for more insight if you want).

Get ready for the reckoning - it is coming.

I encourage you to read on if you want to know more and maybe it will make you think of something and maybe you and I or possibly our relatives in the future will have a conversation because of this, and if so I will know even more that my life has been meaningful.  

Peace,
Ken Hausle
1121 - 5:53 pm EST 

A little interjection here on another special day 2521......10:43 am as I type this now:  Here is the thought:  "I am a world champion whistler in my imagination and nobody can prove me wrong!".  Ha, ha.... 


 

 
Tis 112820 and I feel the power of change all around me.  Maybe it comes from my daughter - maybe not. I feel something powerful happening just now - do you or do you not?  I say to you, are you alive? Are you dreaming of something else -something better? If you are dreaming of something better, then this site might have some insight you'd appreciate.  Maybe, maybe not. What is the harm in checking it out?  What is the harm in that?
 
Today is March 15, 2019 and if you realize that what I say here is my sentiment from a long time ago, and that what I said was correct, then maybe you will give more credence to this site. 
63'19 1:57 am EST - I'll tell you this - there is absolutely nobody in the whole human population on this hearn planet earth who can trace the history of this website, with the one possible exception being myself and my family.
I hope to have more stories to tell but it ain't up to me. Probably up to Okie-Dokit-effing-Dukie - God I wish they were GONE already and they better NOT bury any more line in my yard without permission. - Do you hear me?  Can ya?  I can be pretty loud when I must be. I'm not playing around. Is there anybody paying attention?  Anybody listening - anyone maybe interested in just helping instead of mammon - If so, please introduce yourself.  I need all the help I can get.  It is now 2:04 am and I feel a bit better after getting this off my mind - MIND.......my mind........mine
 
 
OK, hell yeah.  It is July 26, 2020, 72620, and I'm in the midst of a month of repose, but I will tell you this.  The larger "re" and "im" in the text above is no coincidence (how could it be?).  Funny when you get deep in the rabbit hole, what you sense and what you learn. 
 
My other site at this time:  http://www.carbon-tax.net/ 
Republished under different circumstances:  November 28 2018 or otherwise known as:  112818.
I've got some Irish blood in me and I advise anyone against considering doing anything to make that blood boil.  Plus of course I'll never lose my German blood which is filled with LOVE.  Remember what I say below about love.  And God Bless Scotland and even more than that let there be a free Ireland.  Ireland goes first and the Scotland of course joins in the separation from the Kingdom that was never united by choice.  You do understand the English language don't you?

Oh goodness gracious me for heaven's sake, here is the thing about me OK - you can't take everything I type literally - I'd put forth that you can't take anything anybody types or writes down literally because how could it be.  All my griping was for nothing, besides something I thought of in my imagination that made me feel like griping.  OK?  Do you have a problem with that?  If so, skip along you won't be able to understand what I am trying to get across here at this site of free thinking.  So I implore you to read closely and on occasion you have to read between the lines and for that I can't really help, but I hope you have studied hard and learned well because then the concept I'm trying to communicate might resonate with you, but I have no way to know that.  You got your mind and I have mine.  Welcome to the human race. I'm guessing if you are still reading that you are not being pulled by any strings that you are unaware of.  I've got string pulling on me and basically I love them all, but I still have my dignity and if they pull the wrong way I will let them know.  I ain't no puppet.  Got it?
You figure it out.
Ken Hausle is my name.  As well as:  Buffalo_Ken.  That is who I am.
 
Good news today from Psalm 27.  Today is 71419 and Psalm 27 most simply put is Fearless Defense and Salvation.  I think I'm there now and it feels good.  I have Faith in myself and Psalm 27 also speaks of faith, but it is inside the Salvation part.  Fearless Defense is what anyone can do if they know the Lord. 
 
OK, it is now July 16, 2019 71619 and there are two more Psalms I want to talk about.  I'll keep it simple.  Psalm 29 = Fierce.  Psalm 91 speaks of refuge but really is about Protection - they go hand-n-hand.  I have more to share my friends, but I'm thinking I need to know if anyone is reading this or paying any attention to anything besides the current fashion. 
 
(text deleted)
 
Today - 21620
 
I have re-registered an old domain name and now it is published again:  http://www.peoplesproclamation.com/ 
 
This aforementioned site I hope will stay published and it is just as old as this site.  The old formatting is gone, but the text remains.  I worked hard today (21920) and whether it is appreciated or not doesn't matter.  I know in my heart what I am about. 

 (Drumrolls Please - probably for the last time ever, this site is republished - I think I did it yesterday, but todays date is:  72918)  

Please be aware - all of the links on this site may no longer work....this site has a history you must know.

But it is republished for the time being, and here it is.  Take it for what you will.

December 3, 2010.

OK - I admit it this site is a tad unorthodox when it comes to what I have to say about numbers (and shapes if you can make the connection) --- but I stand by the language I use here, and the environmental statements are solid as a rock.  I know my environmental law, but more important than that, I have a good sense of the big-picture.  I may go crazy one day and I probably already have gone crazy on several occasions, but they were temporary, and through it all I held onto my good intent.  That I will take to my grave!  So there you have it.  This site is published again and even if it seems "out there", I'm willing to risk it and share what I have been thinking  12911.  By the way numbers and shapes and language go hand-n-hand-n-hand, and I think we all ought study bismuth a bit more.......83 is a great number if there ever was one.  Bismuth is NOT radioactive.  It is stable and it is Prime!

Okey-Dokey(holdonamoment....)---dukey.  Okey-dokey-dukie, today I'm feeling friendly, so I've decided it is time for a change.  Today is April 14 2011.  41411.  Time to remove some content that is now superfulous.  I'll be back if I can and the good news is that I am typing this from my new home in Virginia.  Today (as well as yesterday) I am a resident of both a state and a commonwealth.  What U think bout that?

Hey, got here by mistake, but maybe not so.  I've deleted some text that was above and this is why if you really want to track this place you must make copies once and awhile.  That is the case for so many things and you don't need me to say this.  Today is 121820. 

_________________

....and it sort of goes this way with me.  If I can't talk, why should I participate?

So, I have other places where I can talk and that is what I will do.  I don't want to be a 2nd tier citizen and nor do I want to be left behind.  I refuse.

Anyhow, over the last few years I have publically posted so many messages on the internet, but this public posting is going to greatly diminish going forward because I will be focussing more of my energy and effort on my own sites that I have registered.  This is probably for the best.

Anyhow, the rest of what is here at this site is all that really matters to me just now.....bye byes can be so hard sometimes and I will miss the interaction with some of my "internet friends", but the best friend is one you can actually touch with your two hands.....it is good to have good friends.

So, in keeping with what I said above, today (11310) (note - there is a 1 13 10 and a 11 3 10 - which is which - well, should I tell?  My guess is that if you want to use an 11' in a 10-based system, then it needs some sort of distinction - by the way, nothing, not even nothing, is perfect, but I got my system - I just haven't flushed it all yet - get my drift - 1 29 11 is the day today - give me about 17 more years and my theories will come to fruition - I'll take that to my grave as well - 11120 - one way or the other, but I plan on being around well past 2028 - what are your plans...hope there is no maliciousness there because you know what I have already said don't you?), I am gonna do a few edits here....  By the way, I live in Charlotte, NC (as ought be most evident) - you can find my address.  It is on the Internet.  So much is on the Internet that so much is noW so obvious.  And just to elaborate:  WE KNOW!

.

OK, it is November 5, 2020 and this is the latest and possibly the last post that there will ever be at this site of free thinking for those who are not puppets.  They say that all the votes must be counted but do the votes really matter? 

They are the strings of conscious.....agenbyte of inwit if you will.  "Text Deleted"  

 

Ayenbite of Inwyt - look it up if you give a flip 

 

________________________________

 

Here is another comment from a public hearing held in Statesville, NC on January 22, 2009 - oh, what a tragic travesty this is becoming.....will dukie ever learn?  I reckon yes, but it remains to be seen if it will be "healthy learning" or learning the hard way; and, as each day goes by with continued insistance by the few without consideration for remedy, the hard way of learning increases in probability.  This seems so evident to me - do you agree?

Comments submitted by a NC Citizen

Public Hearing – Duke Cliffside Permit Amendment

Statesville, NC – January 22, 2009

  

Good Evening.  My name is ("buffalo_ken" - ha, ha) and I live in Charlotte, NC.  Except for one year after college when I worked at two chemical plants, I’ve lived in NC since 1978.  I have a chemical engineering degree from NC State and a Masters in Public Health (Environmental Management Department) from UNC-Chapel Hill.  After I graduated from Chapel Hill, I worked for 16 years as an environmental consultant specializing in air quality with the last 10 years spent running my own one-man company.  I am currently not doing this work anymore, but I’ve been closely following the air permitting process for the Duke Cliffside facility. 

 

Because this public hearing is specifically for the proposed amendment to the air quality permit that has already been issued for the Duke Cliffside conventional coal-fired power plant construction, I will focus my comments on this.  However, just for the record, I did submit comments to the original proposed air permit in opposition and I have also recently submitted comments regarding NCDENR’s proposal to exempt combustion-related toxic pollutant air emissions from the NC Air Toxics rule. 

 

The amended permit proposes a one-time stack test as an option for showing compliance.  Based on my experience, a one-time stack test will not assure ongoing compliance nor will quarterly testing be sufficient.

 

Comment 1 – Proposed Monitoring is Woefully Inadequate for the Following Reasons:

a)     As anyone who has worked at a plant knows (I’ve been to many), operations vary from day-to-day.  Sometimes considerably.  A one-time test cannot reflect this.

b)     Chlorine and fluorine levels (plus other constituent) levels in coal vary.  A single stack test will not properly account for this.

c)     As a general "good permitting" practice, monitoring requirements need to become increasingly stringent as limits are approached.  Guidance developed by EPA during development of the Compliance Assurance Monitoring Rule seriously suggest that for the Cliffside situation, which involves complicated control equipment, a single one-time test (and even possible quarterly tests) does not satisfy this established good permitting practice. 

:

Comment 2 – Proposed Limit Fails to Require Duke to Account for Other HAP Emissions that Must be Considered

Beside emissions from the stack there are considerable emissions from a variety of other supporting ancillary operations (particularly “dusting-type” emissions).  To the best of my knowledge, there is vast legal precedent that requires these emissions to be accounted for.  The permit condition fails miserably in this regard, because it ignores these emissions altogether as if they weren’t even happening.

:

In conclusion, I think the amended permit as proposed should not be issued.  Thank you for the opportunity to speak here publicly.

Building an effective web site can make a huge difference in increasing responsiveness. I agree.  

Services include:

  • (Yet to be defined....please check back later, but for now read below for a bit of detail regarding some of my sentiment as well as a "molecular theory" that I'm working on that is much simpler and I think makes more sense than what is being taught nowadays about very small itty bitty interactions between fundamental entities....).

  • buffalo_ken - edit, 82516 (some great numbers there) - this is a link that remains:  http://www.peoplesproclamation.net/ (you may need to cut and paste that.....sorry) --- damm, I seriously wonder if anyone is noticing anything - probably not, but there is always a chance!.  The whole neutron thing is kind of out there and I'm still studying.  Still, I honestly think it really ought be much simpler than what we have now with respect to quantum physics (SMALL stuff U NO?) - Peace again, Ken Hausle, August 25, 2016 - a nice day! a little baby edit was just made, but going forward I'm not gonna give any more clues_you either get it or you don't and you with either figure it out or you won't.  Makes no difference to me on this fine day in December the 12th month of the crazy year of 20 in the 2nd millenia as they say.....oh yeah, it is the 12th day.  Here, I"ll make it easy cause I like to communicate:  121220.  How you like them apples!

    I was at a meeting not too long ago and I heard some “recent-gnomish-banking-loving-fella” talk about “all the possibilities” to create financial instruments associated with “CO2-trading” (which by the way is already happening).

    Anyhow, on my way out after this presentation, I scowled and scoffed and said “why would we expect these fools” who got us in this mess that we are now in (in the first place) to somehow solve it with more of the same type of “fiscal-schemery” shenanigans.

    I said it won’t happen that way…..these gnomes are on the way out. Seriously. Individually as I sense it. In America, some of us might have been fooled, but not all of us.

    Anyhow, I think there should be a “tax” on the user and on the maker. The tax should reflect the amount of CO2 generated by the product, and the amount of CO2 to get the product on the shelf, respectively. The tax revenues should be used to figure out better alternatives.

    This will make it evident where the inefficiencies lie. I already know the inefficiencies associated with the current “CO2-tax” that we are all subject to, and for which we have been subject for some time now. It is evident.

    AND

    It is time for something better.

    Does this make any sense to U?

    -ken

  • buffalo_ken

    My suspicion is that the amount of CO2 to make and get a product out of the ground and into the store shelf (or tank or whatever) often greatly exceeds the amount of CO2 generated by the product.

    This speaks directly regarding the inefficiencies.

    We could fix it quick!

    Grow some trees why don’t you…..

    By the way, a fews years back I submitted an entry into the $25 million contest. Hadn’t heard much about that of late.

    Grom some trees why don’t ya – its good banking. Good reserves if you know what I mean, and a tree can be grown within just a single human lifetime.

    SIMPLE

  • :smile:

    It is June 29, 2019 — 62919, and I am at this very moment in “The Land of Ice - otherwise known as Iceland”.  Elsewhere on this site I mention that calculus is “flawed at the edges”, and I’d like to briefly expound on that.  It is real simple actually - it boils down to the FACT that calculus arises from an assumption that an itty bitty super small number (let’s call it x) squared is = 0.  That is x² = 0.  But we should all know that even an infinitesimally small number squared still ain’t zero.  This speaks directly to the flaw I referred to and it rarely comes into play unless you live in the pretend land of quantum physics and black holes.  I think we should think and study more about our own bodies than some far off imaginary celestial bodies.  What Do you think?

 

I think Iceland was a wonderful place unlike no other currently on planet earth.  But I think it could be emulated, and I must say I was happy to get back to night and day.

 

A table...
 
Lets put it ALL on the table
Lets talk.
Lets come up with a plan to work together
It can be done..

Join Our Mailing List

By joining our mailing list, you will be the first to know about:

  • Breaking news
  • Helpful tips
  • Who knows what else....
To join, type your name and email address below and then click the Go button:

I'm not sure any of this will work just yet, but I'm going to get this site going if I can...:

The picture below and
buffalo_picture_002.JPG
the picture above encompass the other pictures above - u c?

this just keeps on getting more and more "fun" - a transfer is transpiring - i sense it.  Regardless....here is another message:

Update 1 (1/30/08) - Today I heard that Duke has recieved their permit.  NCDENR has looked through the comments and made their decision.

Public Hearing on Duke Energy’s Proposed New Cliffside, NC Coal-Fired Boiler September 18, 2007 - Comments for Submittal

Update 2 (9/09/08) - (Its actually Update 3 now - 112316 - time to edit out some text -- what is done is done.  Its the future I mainly care about, but of course, if we can't learn from past mistakes, then how can we learn at all?).

Conclusion

In conclusion I want to go on record as adamantly opposing construction of a new conventional coal-fired power plant in Cliffside, NC or anywhere else for that matter. It is time for some new and creative ideas focused on clean and decentralized power generation.

Thank-you for giving me an opportunity to express these views.

Sincerely,

Buffalo Ken, PE

Charlotte, NC

 OK, it is August 25, 2019....you know 82519 and I'm getting old so my new thoughts are diminishing. Even so, when it comes to my non-neutron theory expounded below, I admit it comes down to semantics.  Semantics are NOT trivial. We can all rest assured, time moves on, and there is no miracle to save an old man from his grave.

I'd rather live once then never live at all, and what matters to me is that which I can sense directly.

(And now on to the "theory" that tries to get back to reality) 

 

(Edit, 112316 - I'd like to think this is the most important part of this site and much of the other stuff is a reflection of some real-world consideration that is always happening.  This part though is really just about shape imagination as well as frustration with the science of small which seems to be way more complicated than it should be or needs to be.  It is so complicated, that there is no way to grasp the concepts without a freaking life-time studying quantum mechanics --- makes me think it has almost turned into its own religion that only a few are "qualified" to grasp.  Something bout that just don't seem "right" to me.  What I talk about below is really simple, easily envisioned, and sensible.  That in and of itself puts it a step above). 

 

I think I have just improved my theory regarding the non-existance of neutrons.

I've figured out A way to imagine helium's atomic shape as well as Beryllium's.

1. Helium has two almost totally equal "helium protons" in the "core area" and the 2 of them rotate around each other in constant motion (if they were exactly the same in the beginning there probably could never have been any motion, but it doesn't really matter). They are never exactly the same because they "swap" a bit of material with each other all the time. Swapping and rotating in a cozy core area. Electrons come and "join the party" so to speak to balance off the positive core area, or of course, the electrons may have already been there just waiting for some protons to show up.
 
postscript:  OK, so it tis a dreary rainy early afternoon in Charlotte, NC on a mild February day (the 22nd) in the 10th year......and I have been thinking about "noble" elements on the Periodic Table.  The first two noble ones (so to speak).  Helium and Neon.  Now, lets please consider some number relationships.  Helium is #2.  Take the number 2 and multiply it by itself 3 times and you get 8.  2 + 8 = 10.  Ergo, 2 and 10 are "noble" (in a way) because they resist interaction in most instances especially over time.  But, you can't get to 10 without 3, and this is more than just about numbers.  Think shapes (or perhaps "forms") if you will.  Regardless, the shape of 8 speaks to forever, but at the same time, 8 enables 9.  Without 9, we would have no 10, but it only took two 3's to get to 9.  Know what I'm getting at here?  Anyhow, looks like the sun is starting to appear so maybe the afternoon is not so dreary afterall.  It is now 12:45 pm.

2. Beryllium has its own unique protons but I put forth that in its most stable configuration there is usually a "playoff" between a group of 3 plus one other that moves much more than the 3 do individually. Can you visualize this?  112316 I'll try to expound - So in other words, the 3 would usually be close together all wobbling slightly and the 4th would be independently traveling amongst the 3 but part of the overall group.  At certain moments "members" of the 3 would instantaneously change, such that over any appreciable amount of time there really wouldn't be any individual distinction amongst the 4 as a whole.
 
3. I'll get to lithium later.  Edit, today is November 26th, 2009 - (do you doubt me - ?).  I have just explained lithium (yesterday), but the explanation was elsewhere.  (following text deleted and edited on 112316).  It has to do with chance, and I don't play with chance.  Do you?  Some lessons are hard and some are soft.  Just like science.  Quantum physics by the way is so SOFT..........um, don't you just want to imagine it?  So ends my one and only one discussion regarding lithium, unless of course, you come to my place and ask me face-to-face.  Then we can talk again.  Simple - don't you think?  Maybe not occum's razor simple, but just plum simple.  Simple is as simple does and lithium is so simple, almost too simple to try to describe, but I have nonetheless because I dare to share, and I proclaim: "no harmful intent".  Can you do better?
 
postscript:  my site on lithium:  http://co2-trading.info/index.html   (112316 - sadly the aforementioned site is no longer on the internet....I've got to find my hard copy.......))I'm still thinking about lithium....still thinking, but I know this, it is number 3 on the table, and that is NOT trivial - lithium enables transition to so many of the heavier elements......and I'll say this as well because I have already said it elsewhere, but all of the "radiocative" elements are "suspect" in my book.....they don't last.  I am particularly interested in why #43 Technetium is the first radioactive element to make it on the table.....hmmmmmm ...
 
I found part of the hard copy....here it is.....I'm gonna put this inside a boundary of some 3's.  It is about lithium.
 
3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 
 

Please, let me acknowledge upfront how wonderful I think imagination is.  We wouldn't be here without it.  I have imagination and so do you.  We all do, and I think it (this) is great.  I think it is part of what makes us all individuals and gives each of us integrity.  But, I also think imagination in us "human-folk" is both individual as well as collective, because we are "social animals" - are we not?  Thus, imagination affects the future both individually and collectively, and in this way, imagination can result in both positive or negative consequences depending on what ideas "take hold".  The future is full of uncertainty, but if we imagine peacefully and with reverence, then I think this uncertainty can be navigated successfully. 

I want to share ideas I have with others joyfully so that I can learn from others and perhaps others can learn from me.  I don't want to be alone - especially in my thoughts.  I don't think anyone does.  But, I'll admit, sometimes when I contemplate the "here and now" I feel down about it all, and a sadness enters my heart.  Other times, I feel exuberant, and this feels good, although too much of either is not healthy, and I've learned to strive for balance, but it is an ongoing personal effort.  I've made mistakes in this regard, but I think that I am improving. 

With that said, let me also say that this site started out as a place to discuss "lithium" (Atomic Number 3 on the "Great Periodic Table" - thanks Mendeleev), but as often happens, the site has turned into something a bit different than what I first imagined.  I put forth though that it remains a discussion about "lithium" even if it is a subtle and perhaps circuitous one, and I also put forth that this discussion is certainly open for debate and is most definitely not intended to be harmful in any way, shape, form, or fashion.  Its harmless basically, but it is also helpful (at least it is for me).  What could be better than that?  Whether you peruse this site is totally up to you.  It is your choice.  Free will if you will.  Could anything be better than that I ask again? 

Well, enough of this little "intro", and as I say in so many other places, let me say again:  Peace from me to you and my family to your family.  I pray for peace even as I try to better understand so many things including: lithium, the #3 (literally), and that incredible awesome Periodic Table that is so real it merits deep study in my mind.  In contrast, some things ("concepts") such as "black holes", (which are discussed below) are almost too imaginary, and I think we should put these sort of things on the "back burner" for later study when we are more prepared because we need to better comprehend that which we can directly sense such as the elements on the Periodic Table that we can literally touch, smell, taste, feel, and even hear sometimes.  Then we will have a more informed imagination and won't get ahead of ourselves with certain ideas that are just too full of uncertainty.  Know what I mean?  I hope so because it just seems sensible to me, and that is perhaps the main idea of this site, and it turns out lithium and the number 3 are what got me going down this "thought pathway".  Anyhow, see below if you want to read more on this sentiment.  Peace.

Above "Intro" as typed on this day January 8, 2010 (with an edit on 11010). 

Announcement that stems from the fact that I now better understand black holes even moreso than discussed below (123110):  ........I will tell you this - it has to do with trying to approach 0 - the reality is that it simply cannot be done.  Not anymore.

so on this day, 112316, I will say there is a bunch more and I have it all saved, but for now, I've re-published enough.  Happy Thanksgiving.  I'm thankful and I'm happy that I'm still able to share my ideas.... 

 

(OK - I'm having fun, so lets see how far I can go with this.....below is more from my original site on lithium - Today, by the way, is many years from when I originally came up with this text.  Today is 12'316.  Got it?  Without further ado.....nor with any editing which I'll do later...it is now a bit later and so I will do just a minor edit 12'316 2:11 EST PM

OK - I will now simply and succintly explain why "black holes" (per the current physics nomenclature) do NOT exist. Here goes: Funnels all lead to somewhere else otherwise they would not be a funnel, but rather they would be a "cup". Neither a funnel nor a cup are a black hole, and therefore, black holes do not exist..... Edit: "1810" - 1/8/10 - OK, OK, I admit, this (the last sentance above) is not definitive, but what follows in red is and the concept I was attempting to get across is the important difference between that which is of the "imagination" - such as black holes - versus that which can be directly sensed such as cups and funnels - so just to drag this out some more: I suppose black holes exist in imaginary mathamatics, but we don't really know if a black hole behaves like a funnel or a cup or maybe a bit of both, and honestly what difference does this make to the here and now because it is all speculation, and there has simply been too much of that of late. Speculation is NOT proof and even worse, if unchallenged, it tends to "grow upon itself" leading to even more "vested error" that big egos have a hard time recognizing and acknowledging. Moreover, if something cannot be clearly defined because of too much uncertainty, can it even be understood at all? Might such speculation actually cause unforseen and dangerous consequences just like what happens when we "play" around with "zero" and "infinity" without really understanding our own inherent limitations? I think so, and I also think this sort of thing has been running ludicrously rampant of late and it makes it so hard to differentiate "truth" from fiction, and this accelerates, entrenches, and only gets worse the longer it goes on. It takes on a life of its own, yet it offers nothing in return, and in reality it is nothing but unchallenged fiction that ultimately has no merit. There is too much mud in the water and mountain tops are being blown away so that old life (coal) can be burned. This is foolish and irreverent and I hope that we come to our senses soon because the scales are in the balance - don't you sense this? I do and I think it is high time for some "clear down-to-earth" thinking and focus - and with that typed, let me get back to the older text....(in red). .....They are imaginary mathamatics and that is all they are. Funnels and cups do exist and I think I am now going to have my evening meal and cups will likely be involved and I suspect funnels as well. Ain't life grand? As posted here on this day in the month of December of the 28th day in the 9th year of the 2nd Millennia (per present day conventional calendar sensibilities - know what I mean?). Have you seen a black hole? Have you smelled one? Have you been near one? What happened to you if so? If not, then you have no idea other than your imaginary mathamatical foolishness based on Calculus which we should all know is FLAWED at the edges...as is just about everything else in a way. Still, I love a good funnel and cups are awesome. OK, time to choose a color for the above text....I chose RED for the above text, because I'm tired of harmful imagination - sometimes for the original "imaginator", it (their imagination) may seem innocuous (especially if they think, I am just trying to be a "scientist" - can anyone say "quantum physicist"?), but the more detached it is from physical reality, the more likely are the "unexpected consequences" such as an irreverence for life in general by a few who think they are capable of "creating reality" for everyone else for the sake of their own ego-based, selfish, worldly, materialistic "benefit" - talk about sick.....I'm tired of it, and I'm not the only one and I can PROVE this. Can we not do better with our enlightened individual and collective consciousness? I think so, but I know this also: Time is of the essence and the clock is ticking.   HELPFUL HINTS are always welcome  But with that said, harmful intent is NOT desired and if you send it my way be prepared for me to send some justified retribution back at ya!  I proclaim no harmful intent, so please don't misinterpret me, but if you doubt my proclamation, then I say to you: Prove your doubt without harm. A short interlude on this day (it ain't may), sometime in April near the last portion of the month in the year of 10. Anyhow, here is the word of the day: PAPRIKA - how you like them apples? You can do whatever you want to, but you do know that there are always consequences don't you? You are alive aren't you? You are not the only one, and I can prove it. come to my place if you are interested and at this site, information will be shared. OK - I have decided to raise this up a notch because I can although I will admit, I wasn't sure where to put this....just now it is on a piece of paper. Hm. Here goes (I decided to put it here for now for the sake of "staying on topic"): Now think about this. Black holes are like an opportunity - especially if you are merely a black hole spectator - keeping your distance but observing nonetheless. Well then it could be most interesting (or should I say "fascinating"?) to watch as something else approached the black well, I mean hole. Oh well, nothing to do but sit back and watch to sense "what must happen"..... Could be a good learning opportunity especially since you know there is nothing you can do to help in this scenario. My advice would be this Keep you distance from black holes! _____________________________________________________ As typed in: 11810 - 8:52, then 8:55, then 9:00 am EST (starting with above greenish text 'OK.....' that I won't edit again....i hope) _____________________________________________________

(We need a break from all of this lithium bullshit that I have created ------- there was a better explanation, but that site has been eliminated - I gave a hard copy to a pretty girl that I was fond of, and I think she recognized it for what it was.  Ok, this break is over.  71419 it is 6:41 pm eastern time. 

1 2 3 table NOW i have explained "lithium"......loop back if you can So if you don't think that explained lithium, then it is not my fault. I just explained it as best I could at the time I tried. More than likely a better explanation is forthcoming, and in fact, I am woking on it as I type this. Meanwhile, I will be working on some other things...........including the so-called Times New Roman.. An addendum to the upfront statement in this column: 1. I love staring into space as much as the next physicist fella or lady. 2. There is nothing wrong with staring into space - we can learn much this way. 3. As long as we understand our own limits ---- particularly limits of the imagination - particularly mathamatical imagination. 4. Because as I've stated elsewhere - if you go too (2 two to) far forward, then imagination is FULL of uncertainty and eventually approaches the limit of "no probability" whereas, going backwards ain't nothing but science in action. Science enables PROOF. ps - I don't believe the big bang happened either, but at least I know this - YOU CAN NEVER PROVE THE BEGINNING! Time - you can't go back and you can't go forward excepting perhaps just an itty bit in imagination. Collective imagination (i.e. ideas that resonate) can go forward the most. Taken to its logical extreme individual thought is a DEAD end road for us all. If it don't resonante, then who gives a flip bout it? Not I. So anyhow, it can be fun to think about "black holes" and such, but it is better to just recognize a cup as a cup and a funnel for what it is. A funnel is a way to move something from one place to another with ease. Funnels are good, you can hold em, touch em, and they work well for what they are "designed" to do - that is assuming they are well built. A cup is worthless (or at least it ain't a cup anymore) if it has a hole - especially a hole near the bottom. Who needs a leaky cup? Might as well make the leak bigger and turn it into a funnel, but even then if it started out as a cup, it will probably never amount to much of a funnel. Simple really if you understand shapes and such. Happy New Years to All - 2010 is gonna be a GOOD year. I feel it. (the above "starting with the red text" was written on this day December 29, 2009 as an addendum to the text at the beginning of this column). 3 is so simple it is beautiful in this way....4 is even better and sometimes I think 5 is the best, but I know 6 exists as does 7 and of course 8 is 2 sweet being that it is 2 raised to the power of 3. Hm. 8 makes me hungry for some PINK! (and now I have better explained lithium)! I'm so fond of pink --- I love to eat it up. Guess what? - this site has been renewed for 9 additional years until sometime in 2019, and so until then, as long as I am alive, you are gonna have to suffer through reading what I have to type! What do you think of this. I don't know about you but I am excited about this. Now a long time ago in my "internet life" I typed some things on many sites, and when I typed it, I meant it. Just as I mean it now as I type this. See you again in 2019 and inbetween I hope...... - "2012" is just a big joke by a bunch a of seemingly mean ladies (mostly bitter old women) who have no clue (in my mind)....about what it means to love somebody else. Know what I mean as I whistle in the wind? Do you? If so, good, please stay in touch cause we need touch. Don't you think so? If not, why are we here in the first place?

(Wow, I am sure that is hard to read without the formatting that it previously had...."sorry"....but you might be able to gleam something from it, and I'll be back later if I can) 

3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333    


 
4. I'd surmise that Boron entails 5 well-positioned "boron protons". A nice simple configuration.  It is 1 10 20 about 6:12 pm EST and I figured out 5's most stable shape today.  I'll come back later and explain this if I decide things have calmed down as they should.  I mean you wouldn't have believed the presence that was around me today - I sensed it in a way, and the way I look at it, I thank them for their protection, but I think it is unneccesary.  I can defend myself and I will if need be.  I'll tell you this, the shape I plan on describing is in the tiles of the floor that I laid down in my foyer.  Such a beautiful shape and so steady, solid, reliable...2-dimensionally or 3...I just think 5 is the best.  If I'm involved in some sort of goofy political organization in the future, I will argue for some sort of group of 5.  It is the most stable.  It is January 12, 2020 and here is the thing.....you don't need me any more to explain any of this stuff and I know that.  But I think I'm gonna live beyond 2028 because I am blessed.  The beauty of it all is that so are you, but you may not live beyond 2028 and neither may I.  It is all a bit of speculation because there is no way to know for sure.  The shape of 5 requires 3-dimensional thinking to describe and I'm working on an easily understood explanation.  That is my gift after all.  Peace for everyone.  Peace is what need and really.....peace is so easy.  And then we get fruits and bounty if you can imagine that.
 
OK, I'm back here to try - it is 41820.  Here is the thing about "5" - 5 is essentially ALWAYS a relationship between 1 in the "middle" and two 2's in the vicinity.  It is not simple because those in the groups of 2 can seem as if they are each 1 individually and often they will be in a moment.  But take the moments together and you have at any given moment, 1 proton and 2 groups of 2 protons.  I just don't think the 1-3-1 setup lasts even longer than a moment - it is too unstable.  Probably the more important thing is that the 2 groups of 2 aren't really independent because they are supportive of each other.  It could be a supportive proton has different properties, but that is speculation so take it with a grain of salt, but this could also have something to do with why neutrons do not exist.  Regardless, the 5 protons in boron find the most stable configuration naturally because it comes easy.  On a two dimensional plane there are so many shapes this way - can you envision it?  Here is an example that is basically 1-dimensional (even though it isn't):  ** * **  .  Here is another // * \\  So, move those outside stars or slashes around as you please - on and off the page if you want, but just keep things balanced.  It is easy and there are many shapes.  If there are many shapes 2-dimensionally, then imagine how many more there are once you go into the next dimension.  But don't forget that 5 is an absolute number - also, I think for now, there is no point in breaking things down more than just the proton (and of course the balancing electron) unless we want to play with forces we don't understand.........that is risky and history has demonstrated that it leads to a dead end.
 
5. Please note - per this "small model", not all protons are the same and neutrons don't even need to exist.  (112316 - KEY Concept if this theory has any validity - NOT all protons are the SAME! - what matters from a periodic table standpoint is HOW many protons are together in total and that forms the element into which they manifest)
 
6.  I could discuss carbon and I will because for heaven's sake this site in named http://www.carbon-tax.us/ (loop back!)
Edit:  August 28, 2009 - I have a poker game that I am setting up for tonight so I need to be brief - I think 6 creates shapes that are so tough there is no changing these shapes.  Thanks goodness for 6 because without it we would never have 7.  And of course, without 5, six would not exist.  There is an order to all of this - don't you think?
:
7.  OK, we must be up to #7 now, and for Nitrogen (out of respect for the fog around my house this morning), for now, I will say one thing and one thing only:  "electron cloud" - talk about volume, and then you get gases (excepting of course those first two, who act like gases most of the time, but have most interesting behavior when the pressure is on (or/and or even and/or if the temperature is chilllllllllly - oh so cold - this potentially sepurfulous edit was added at 1:03 pm on 22210 - ha!).  OK, after N, comes oxygen, and I am all about that!  Oxygen is critical for any compost bin.  No doubt in that, at least here, on Planet Earth where we all reside.  I mean think about it........how can you measure back to some "big bang" using materials and elements created after the supposed big bang happened in the first place?  No way.  Can't be done.  So please, get over yourselves.  After you find the next "big mystery" particle or entity, what will be the next big mystery?  What a waste this Switzerland swirling high-energy wasting foolishness is.  Get some common sense would be my advice to those quantum physicist working there who think they know something about nothing!  Get a clue and for old-times sake:  "Get a Grip" .  Love is the bottom LINE.  Oh, and lastly for this RANT, let me be the first to say that I do not know anything about nothing.  Not a thing.  I know nothing about nothing nor will I ever know anything about nothing.  What is there to know anyhow?  Nothing?  I'm not interested.  Nothing is nothing but bad imagination in the minds of a few who have no idea about what it means to be mutual.  Thank goodness there are only a few of them left....Oh man, this is a seriously interjected thought late in the game for this site - in fact this is my latest addition dated October 5, 2019 about 1:10 pm EST - 10519-1310 - EST. 
 
So here it is:  I think nitrogen protons normally consist of three groups as follows:  3   1   3.  What happens is the two groups of three get far apart from each other, but they remain held together by the 1 in the middle.  Can you visualize this?  Consider human dynamics as a way to sense it.  Have you ever been the "1" in the middle?  Its tight being stuck between two groups of 3.  Regardless, the whole set of these nitrogen protons tend to be relatively far away from each other, and that is why Nitrogen is usually a gas.  10719 - Lastly on this topic for awhile, there could also be an N-group of 2   2   2    1    or any combination thereof.  This will also be a gas and it mixes in there with the    3   1    3     which by the way is more stable over time, but when it comes to small particles, time is less than amongst us humans, so don't forget that.  I just think speculative things shouldn't be overly complicated because otherwise they lead to needless confusion which creeps towards polarization, which sucks for us ALL.  Anyhow, if we focus on what we can sense, then there won't be so much speculation.
:
Oh let me put a "date" on this:  (M-2, Year 9, December 14, a Monday, 9:42 am (NOW 9:45 or so), Eastern Standard Time (US))...or there-abouts.  Anyhow, what I discussed above dealt with an important question in my mind as to why some elements tend to be solid and why others tend to be gases, and any good model ought be able to account for this known scientific fact!  I think my model does already, but if you give me about 20 years, then I suspect it will.  After that, I'll be happy to discuss this in detail with others, and maybe even before if you want to come to my place, but let me please say, I prefer guests who arrive with an invitation, and as for quests, I'll take them if I am in the mood.  If not, then my response will likely be accordingly!  And one last thing, Fluorine (#9) is most reactive, I should know - I've been around it for a long time.  Adious Amigos!
Note:  Text color changed 10:03 am, same day as referenced just above.......12'149......am time.....if you want to go out a few decimal places, but I didn't feel the need for such goofy precision that is really only imaginary!
*****

Peace,
Ken
ps - more will be forthcoming (I hope!).
here is something else:  a link!
(link deleted - 71819) another site of mine.....links to others.
loop back if you can, loop around if that is better, just be considerate of your neighbor - don't you think so...
,,,,so tell me this if you know anything....why is technetium #43 and do you think it is a coincidence that if you doubt (I mean "double") 43 you get into some serious radioactive activity?  Well let me tell you, it is not a coincidence, and this is why shapes matter, and my little theory here is better than what is being considered just now, and that is why you ought consider what I have to say.  Do you think that was circular? 

Element talk:.

 

Beryllium 4: I just love beryl - I love an emerald in the sea! 

Boron:  5:  solid as a rock;

Carbon 6: pretty as a diamond;

Nitrogen 7:  blowing in the wind;

 

A good link Kropoktin:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Kropotkin

 

Oxygen 8:  good for life;

Based on what I've recently been saying - 100819 - Oxygen, most obviously, would be four 2's hanging around each other.  That can be very reactive.  A very reactive gas is what oxygen is on planet earth.  Normally, after it reacts, it becomes a molecule, that can be a gas, but usually is solid.  Oxygen (as well water) are in a bunch of rocks.  Nevertheless, and lucky for us on planet earth, a bunch of elemental oxygen got released as a gas and now we get to breath it.  I call that a form of simple living "Mutual Aid", or at least, it ought be considered as such because without it we wouldn't be here.  In this recent day, where the atmoshpere's composition has really been changing fast, for the sake of Mutual Aid going forward, can we plant some trees please....why don't ya.....Ken.

So ends today's posting:  A special day in my way of reckoning things.  5210.  About 2:27 pm, EST.

 

So if you don't mind, today it is May 4, 2010 (the day before Cinco de Mayo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinco_de_Mayo )......5410 as I like to say, but the purpose of this entry is to pose a question.  I said earlier that 5210 was "special" to me, and why do you think this is? (that is not my question that I'm posing....it was rhetorical).  Well, this is why:  5 x 2 = 10.  From a Periodic Table standpoint, what do you think this means?  (that is the question I am posing).


Be aware that the reciprocal of 10 is quite the number.  More importantly, the reciprocal of the square root of 10 is truly "something else" and without it we would not be here is what I think.......

There are a few of them out there that I love and I hope that they know, but even if they don't it will still make a difference....the love that I put out there and the fact that I loved them. 

Do you know about this love....if not, let me send some to you.  I send you love.  What could be better than that?

Hard to know one way or the other sometimes, but I have faith.....doctor my eyes.  I have faith.  Remember - we are all in this together.  It is 71220 3:11 EST.  Ken H aka bk.

Let me add that we have 10 toes along with 8 fingers and 2 thumbs - do you think this is a coincidence?  It ain't.  Lastly, if "we" used a base 8 numbering system, would there be a value that has the same atrributes as the reciprocal of the square root of 10?  I suspect the answer is........well, actually, I am plum not sure about this, nor am I sure I want to figure it out.  What difference would it make.  A reciprocal that is essentially a reflection of itself is simply fascinating to me and speaks to many mysterious combinations in the world of numbers, and the same holds true with the elements of the Periodic Table.  That is what I think.  A reciprocal that is an irrational number and is also a reflection of itself is even more fascinating....just amazing....just wonderful and so connected to almost essentially everything!

Peace out Amigos and Happy Cinco de Mayo!

It is March 5th.  2011.  9:44 am Eastern (US) Standard Time:  Take a cube.  Roll it hard.  It will break up into how many planes?  6 of course.  Reorient the planes however you please.  How many possible shapes are there?  Now I better understand 6 and after it comes the Nitrogen cloud....thank goodness for that.

See you later,

Ken Hausle

 Um, I am sitting here reading my website after so many years.  Still rings true to me, so I reckon I will continue its registration for a few more years.  As long as the price is fair..

Signed by me - my name is Ken Hausle and I know. Today is May 23 2019.  52319.  It is  12:13 pacific time...or it was back then.  Now when I added my last name to the last line of this site it is 122219 8:21 EST.  Peace.

111920:  Exposed again in a new place.  Here are two links that may or may not work going forward.  Get em while you can.

http://earthmatrix.com/giza/square_roots.html 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMhg604W8

So just to ramble a bit, here I am again as 2020 is drawing to an end.  A crazy year it has been and I sensed this from the beginning.  If you use your senses with all your body and brain, you'd be amazed at what you can learn.  But I know this, I have a lot left to learn and I'm hoping I get to do it.

Peace, Ken.   

111920 

1 11 20 - How about a little poetry to wrap this up for now.  It came from another site of mine (kjh-es.com) that was published initially in 2007 I think (5th Page for first two and first page for 3rd) and stayed published off and on until maybe a few years ago.  Anyhow, here are the poems:

A thought on ideas

Who owns an idea? Once its out, then its out.

It cannot be owned, but can be shared.

Same goes for a concept.

Once its out, its out.

.

Beyond control and ownership.

Its an idea for heaven's sake.

.

It lives on and is constantly being...

RE-shaped.

.

It is not MI-ne. It is not yours.

It does not belong to h-IM. Nor to hER.

If it belongs to anything it belongs to us all.

.

Anyhow, who can really own anything at all....

**********************************************

*

Small Who

How small can it go. Infinitely so?

How go so; how go so small.

Art is small and big and tall.

Art is all. Isn't it?

Well maybe not all.....

.....but it sure is a ball.

Good ole art..

full of heart..

....well.....

Once its out, then its out. 

 

 =====================================================

Here is the last one.  it is more of a thought experiment than a poem, but it could be either or both for that matter: 

Take a straight line inside of a circle. Rotate the line on an axis located at the center of the circle in a fixed

two-dimensional plane (think of a clock). How many positions are there to orient the line? Now I think I

know the answer and it depends on many things. If the line is infinitely thin then there are obviously infinite

orientations I suppose. If the line has "uniform" thickness, then it depends on whether it is permitted to

overlap amongst the orientations. If not, then the number of orientations is finite and depends upon the line's

thickness. If it is allowed to overlap in orientations, then it gets more complicated depending on the

"overlapping restrictions". Now does anyone here believe that infinitely thin lines or even lines with uniform

thickness exist? I do, but I know that they are imaginary - they only exist in my mind and I don't

"see" (sense) how this could be any different for anyone else. [TANGENT: An infinitely thin line would be like

a clipped "zero" (0) that was then bent and stretched into a line. But, I think zero is also imaginary as is

infinity. Infinity might be but how could this ever be proven (all the data will never be in!!!). Same with zero

in a way - perhaps it might have been per one definition, but we will never know - how could we. You can't go

back in time, and even if you could, it won't be the same as it was - now will it?].

Zero and infinity are not that "big a deal", but if you are not careful and "play around" with these concepts (mathamatically and

otherwise) without understanding them it can lead to unforseen and totally unexpected consequences. (text deleted). 

Today is 1/17/20 and I'm gonna republish the site from a roughly two-day downtime, but I have already thought of something that I plan on adding here.  In fact, maybe a few things (you wouldn't believe all the material I have from days of yore).  Mostly poems because like I said earlier, it is easier to live in a world of metaphor.  For me, it is also more peaceful. 

It is 52820 and I just deleted a bunch of text because it didn't need to be here anymore.  It is still out there, but it is elsewhere.  Click around if you want to find it.  However, there is poem I've been thinking about that I already wrote and just below this text is where I plan on placing this poem.  I just need to remember what I thought it should be, so it will be later.  I hope you can be there with me when this happens.  Know what I mean?

Oh, hello, it is Father's Day, and you should be able to figure out the year.  Here is the poem, I was thinking about from a long time ago:

Welcome to this site.

Before I add anything further, I've decided first to just post the following kindergarden-simple premise on:

 "fair play"

1.  Principles/rules are needed for communities to thrive.

2.  The best rules are easy to understand and make sense.

3.  Know the rules.

4.  Rules are necessary for play.

5.  If the rules are broken, the play becomes tragic.

6.  If the rules are followed, everyone learns.

7.  It is fun to learn.

8.  So follow the rules.

Goofy rules baby-monologue (try making your own):

a.  The wiz of oz is imaginary.

b.  Everyone has imagination - INTEGRITY.

c.  Imagining things is awesome (or are you hopeless?).

d.  Fun is for everyone - no exclusions (U R NOT superior).

e.  Lets have fun shall we?

f.   Lets work together - tell me why not?

g.  Imagine what it could be like and don't harm others.

h.  "Balance" the rules with love cause scale matters.

 
 

Any Street * Anytown * Anyplace

 It is July 2020 - (7620).  I like the poem above because I think it is fair.  For me, this month of July will be a month of "repose" (at least I hope so).  I don't plan on posting on forums nor posting much on my own websites, because I need some repose.  I need some time to think about what is really important and what isn't.  I need time to decide what I am going to do with myself and how I want to interact with others to achieve goals that I consider important.  I encourage others to strive for some repose during these times of uncertainty.  We should know that we need to work together -- the challenge lies in making this happen.  I pray for peace.  Ken.

OK, tis 71120 and off the cuff here is another poem....let it fly:

I told you I was tired... of the bitching....

I said this time is gonna be different...

So quit ya bitching.

When I said it, I meant it.....I'm a man of my word.

The times, the folks, the attitude...changing fast.

What you expect during this pinnacle of uncertainty.

Hold onto you hats.

A storm is on the way.

A storm of the ages -

Nature is MAD! 

I feel it and it ain't gonna be perty 

Mi-Re and Re-Mi getting together...

There

is ("IM")

no ("ER")

going 

back!

God Bless that. 

Praise the Lord and bring the STORM on...

...it will be remembered...... by the survivors. 

So says Re-Mi!  So says my ray. 

(Let it be) 

 

(Ok, a little interlude, here on a reposing month of July crazy year 20....effing 20....day of 16 time of 8:56 pm EST.  I know my repose is probably not deserved, but I have been working hard. I'm not working for mammon.  Who are you working for reader?) 

 

I declare 2020 the year of peace.  Peace from me to you and from my family to your family.  There are big families and small, short ones and tall, tough ones and sweet, black and brown and yellow and red and white and all shades inbetween - don't you love your family?  The biggest human family is all of us - one and all.

When certain leaders in the family are ill and they are not thinking wisely, sometimes they try to dominate to hold onto past anger I suppose, but these days are coming to an end - individually for these leaders as I sense it because we all deserve something better and there are better leaders already.  I know they can do what must be done.  Let there be Peace sayeth my Lord.  

 

So, I edited the most recent poem published on this site - it is just above - today 71220, but I'm not typing this to talk about that, I thought of a question for consideration if for nothing else besides the humor in my imagination......so, if I say here "text deleted" how could anybody know if that was true?  Well, I'll give you a clue.  Sometimes it is a good idea to make a copy of something with a time stamp.  Then later on, you can check.  So if you did that you could have some confidence in the veracity.  However, if I say "text deleted" just now, can anybody prove or disprove that?  I know the answer.  Text Deleted.

Guess what, just like almost everything else, the answer is NOT black and white.  Text Deleted Again. 

__________________________________________________________

It is January 23 2020 and without a doubt the world is crazy these days (probably always has been up till now but don't need to stay that way) but at least we all know each other.....or at least of each other and the fact that we all exist here on this grand planet of blue and green.  So to end this site (not kidding) here is a poem from long ago:

Moderation

 

In the middle is the place to be….

Because from here is where you sense

 

Both Up and Down + High and Low

Soft and Loud + Left and Right.

 

On the edge you never know…

Someone can push you - then off you go…

 

Or could it be, you will fall on you own.

Where will you land?

 

The rollercoaster is fun…as long as it’s not overdone…

Afterwards it’s good to be on steady ground.

 

Moderation is where it’s at…

Away from the precarious edge.

 

Temper yourself and remain steadfast.